Angelic Kitty Miracle Chan
I have been vaugely familiar with Colin Armistead's work online for a couple of years, mainly from his Yume Nikki 3d model gifs to artworks he has posted online. However, the most recognizable yet seemingly enigmatic creation of hers, that had been in works for a while was the titular character of Colin's CalArts 2025 short film; Angelic Kitty Miracle Chan.
Ever since it finally released to the public on Youtube, it has been the subject of criticism and praise. Much harsher critics who found and watched the film put it on blast for potraying a very outsider and misinformed view of weaboos/hardcore anime fans akin to old boomer mindsets or that for a film that was supposed to be about transgender issues surrounding a transgender main protagonist, it had been too shallow and inadvertently or intentionally transphobic especially with both topics combined of an anime obsessed trans shut-in.
Those who were in favor of the film or had more positive views on it combatted the more negative criticism, expressing that Angelic Kitty Miracle Chan and Alex (the main protagonist) were authentic potrayals of lived trans experiences some had and mainly the struggles they dealt with.
I will not linger any further on online discourse as interesting as it is, but I will share my opinion and what I felt upon finishing my viewing of Angelic Kitty Miracle Chan when it first released.
Angelic Kitty Miracle Chan is very blunt in it's topic of trans struggle, mainly with exploration and escapism through media. After watching the film and seeing the different opinions arise, I decided to read the full press inteview held with Colin and the voice actor of Miracle Chan, Phoebe about the film. The interview generally answered and explained the ideas behind the film and the intent the creators had about it, especially in relation to the topic of gender identity.
While I think there's a lot to be critiqued and discussed of how the film goes about with these themes and topics at the end of the day, I did find the idea and story of Alex compelling and sympathetic. The film is very clear with showing how Alex struggles with confidence and self isolates from people (mainly, other most likely cis girls), you root for Alex to get out of her room and attend that party she was invited to, yet the film ends on a bleak and chilling note right after Alex quite literally throws away what she thought would make her happy/more true to her idol and in turn herself. I can understand even the harsh critiques of Alex being a bordeline transmisygonistic stereotype of a “civilized western person corrupted by east asian cartoons” or a “man who wants to be a woman but has unrealistic standards of what feminity is through anime girls” due to the end and the pretty unflattering shots of Alex being awkward and a hermit who’s obsessed with a moe anime girl. But, I do think these critiques are missing the point of Alex’s character, once again you’re supposed to understand why Alex likes something like Angelic Kitty Miracle Chan so much despite how “weird” it seems to “normies” and empathtize with her struggle of exploration and belonging, you ultimately want Alex to succeed in some way whether it'd be hanging out with her peers or coming out and transitioning. If I could put in my own input, I relate to the feeling of not belonging and the fear of not meeting my expectations/wants with gender presentation/transition, I relate to how bleak it does feel living as a transgender person who lives in a pretty transphobic/trans unfriendly environment in Asia and contemplating my choices to stay in the closet for safety vs going through hoops and unacceptance by those who have power over me for being myself.
It is a difficult and complex discussion when it comes to media representation of minority/opressed groups just due to the world we live in, no one can be a true spokesperson of the “definitive” truth and groups of various people from differing backgrounds and opinions and life experiences are not monoliths. Of course we shoot down negative stereotypes common in past potrayals of certain groups especially when they are outwardly harmful no matter how “true” it can be, however we should not conflate that with minority characters who are imperfect characters are have less than desirably traits.
This of course is also a very naunced topic especially with who ends up potraying such representation, we emphasize the importance of getting authentic voices and differing points of views from the people or group you end up potraying, however, that should not close off the ability to discuss or write characters or experiences by people who aren't of that background, especially when they are good (good however is highly subjective and once again, naunce is to be had about still doing your due dilligence and not speaking over people). For clarification, Colin and Phoebe (from the interview) are both trans themselves and are obviously writing from a place of personal experience, of course this won't align with everyone's own experience being trans or lgbt, but should that really matter in the end when it comes to the work itself, devoid of this information? Would knowing that this did come from an authentic and personal place change people's critiques of the film magically? Does it matter when viewing the work for what it is and what state it was presented in, quite frankly while I have a much more positive-neutral view of this film, the shots are quite mediorce/nothing too special and the film I think was too short/ended too suddenly and Alex and the minor side characters of the film while serving their purpose are pretty one note. The only standout moments of this film are the beginnning animation and the scene where Alex puts on the costume of Miracle Chan which is really impressively made/has good attention to detail.
It's clear that despite the accusations of this film being a smarmy “heh! I'm so much better than those perverted animes” message or being anti-weaboo, this film was a love letter to Moe and anime (if it wasn't clear from the really accurate style study done), it was not half assed in that department which a lot of media that do actually fall into what I formely mentioned tend to be (ahem, looking at you class of 09). While not my favourite short film ever, not even close, nor particulary memorable apart from Miracle Chan and the explosive discussion sprouted from this film, I appreciate the approach it wanted to take towards topics people generally seem afraid to touch upon, least they get publicly witch hunted from, this shouldn't discourage anyone from either improving upon it's ideas or challenging it.
At the same time, I don't blame the much harsher critiques of this film even if I disagree (generally if they aren't legitimately just bigoted), people of that group represented on the big screen are allowed to have differing opinions on things especially when it impacts/speaks on their own lived experiences and you shouldn't cherrypick who exactly of that group you think is more correct than the other. Once again, transgender people/transgender women are not monoliths.
Conclusion: Angelic Kitty Miracle Chan wasn't really mind blowing or the literal devil, it is a fine enough short film that has pretty animated visuals and sparks up interesting debate, the former probably being it’s lasting legacy in online discussion, apart from Miracle Chan as a character design. It did make me think though especially of topics I feel passionate about, which is definitely more a positive than some other things I've seen, especially of the same subjects it handles.
Ranking:
7 Lobotos out of 10